Digg Censored me Because I Wrote About Ron Paul Being Censored

I just wrote about Ron Paul being Censored by Google and posted my article up on digg. Then about 30 minutes later, I start getting server 500 errors from Digg.com when I visited their site.

I checked with my co-workers and they all COULD get to digg. I think digg decided to censor me by blocking my access to digg.com because digg is tired of all the Ron Paul related articles. It most certainly can not be a coincidence that I was the only one in the office with these issues could it be?

I have two images I would like to submit as my proof that digg was in fact targeting me in a cruel act of censorship.

The first is the error message I was getting:

screenshot-diggcom-out-of-service-mozilla-firefox.png

And the second is a photo taken with my iPhone of my computer (the one I used to submit the original offending article to digg on) and a co-workers computer. You can clearly see that my co-workers was able to get to digg while mine was not!
photo.jpg  border=

Lets NOT stand for this uncalled for censorship by digg! Digg my story up and lets call digg out!

4 Responses to “Digg Censored me Because I Wrote About Ron Paul Being Censored”

  1. James Says:

    I just dugg your story about being banned from digg and I’ve been banned too.

  2. Seattle-G Says:

    I had no clue who Ron Paul was until one day his jack-ass campaign members ruined my drive home. A group of morons stand on a pedestrian overpass that spans Interstate-90 in Washington State. They like to stand on this overpass with large signs every other Friday during rush hour. These jack-holes increase my commute by an additional 30 minutes.

    So I looked up Ron Paul to make sure I knew who he was so I would NOT vote for him. How can I vote for someone with such stupid supporters? Ruining the rush hour commute on a Friday is not a good way to garner support and love.

    Ron Paul supporters in the Seattle area are complete asshats.

  3. Curtis Says:

    They didn’t increase your commute by a half-hour. Quit lying.

  4. Seattle-G Says:

    Normally it takes 25 minutes to get home from my office. On the nights they are on the pedestrian overpass it takes 55 to 60 minutes. The average speed I am traveling on that section of I-90 is 60 MPH. When they are on the overpass the section of I-90 is reduced to 10 to 15 MPH.

    25 + 30 = 55. Bold calling someone a lier without any proof. Plus I do not have the time to spread lies about political potentials. Do you really think this “lie” as you call would have any impact on his effort? Maybe you are one of the monkeys on the overpass. If you are you might try another campaign approach. That campaign method has been discussed in my neighborhood. Not one neighbor that suffers through that commute is fond of Mr. Paul, and most are conservative. Bottom line, irritating people is not a good way to rally support.

Leave a Reply

iPhoneTopsite.com