I just wrote about Ron Paul being Censored by Google and posted my article up on digg. Then about 30 minutes later, I start getting server 500 errors from Digg.com when I visited their site.

I checked with my co-workers and they all COULD get to digg. I think digg decided to censor me by blocking my access to digg.com because digg is tired of all the Ron Paul related articles. It most certainly can not be a coincidence that I was the only one in the office with these issues could it be?

I have two images I would like to submit as my proof that digg was in fact targeting me in a cruel act of censorship.

The first is the error message I was getting:

And the second is a photo taken with my iPhone of my computer (the one I used to submit the original offending article to digg on) and a co-workers computer. You can clearly see that my co-workers was able to get to digg while mine was not!

Lets NOT stand for this uncalled for censorship by digg! Digg my story up and lets call digg out!

Its finally confirmed that Google has a political bias and has been censoring results for Ron Paul. Using Google’s own numbers and comparing them against the same searches against Yahoo it is clear that Google is actively censoring search results for Ron Paul keywords.

Take a look at the data:

We even have photographic proof that Yahoo loves Ron Paul more that Google.

In summary Google things that Ron Paul suck 50% more often while Yahoo thinks that Ron Paul rocks 20% more often.

Come on Google we all thought you ‘Did No Evil’. How can you be censoring the most popular politician on the Interwebs?

Is this a conspiracy on the part of Google? Has Google joined the ranks of the Main Stream Media? Or is it simply that Yahoo provides ‘better’ search results when your interested in Ron Paul?